Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Benjamin Barber, et al v. Pat Garrett
as 20-35832
Petitioner / Appellant:
BENJAMIN BARBER
Respondent / Appellee:
PAT GARRETT
Petitioner:
JAY DAVID LEATHERWOOD and JAYCOB PATRICK HOLTEN
Benjamin Barber, et al v. Pat Garrett
as 20-35419
Petitioner / Appellant:
BENJAMIN BARBER
Respondent / Appellee:
PAT GARRETT
Petitioner:
JAY DAVID LEATHERWOOD and JAYCOB PATRICK HOLTEN
Barber et al v. Garrett
as 3:2019cv01967
Petitioner:
Jaycob Patrick Holten, Benjamin Barber and Jay David Leatherwood
Respondent:
Pat Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Benjamin Barber, et al v. USDC-ORP
as 19-71552
Petitioner:
JAYCOB PATRICK HOLTEN and BENJAMIN BARBER
Not Yet Classified:
BEN CANNON, Director of the Higher Education Coordinating Commission, PAT GARRETT, Sheriff, KATE BROWN, Governer of Oregon and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, PORTLAND
Not Classified By Court:
In re: BENJAMIN BARBER
Benjamin Barber, et al v. Pat Garrett
as 19-35335
Petitioner / Appellant:
BENJAMIN BARBER
Respondent / Appellee:
PAT GARRETT
Petitioner:
JAYCOB PATRICK HOLTEN and JAY DAVID LEATHERWOOD
Benjamin Barber, et al v. Pat Garrett
as 19-35334
Petitioner / Appellant:
BENJAMIN BARBER
Petitioner:
JAYCOB PATRICK HOLTEN and JAY DAVID LEATHERWOOD
Respondent / Appellee:
PAT GARRETT, Sheriff
Barber et al v. Garrett
as 3:2018cv02063
Petitioner:
Jaycob Patrick Holten, Benjamin Jay Barber and Jay David Leatherwood
Respondent:
Pat Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barber et al v. Garrett
as 3:2018cv01870
Petitioner:
Jaycob Patrick Holten, Benjamin Barber and Jay David Leatherwood
Respondent:
Pat Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holten et al v. Panio et al
as 1:2013cv01269
Plaintiff:
Sharon Holten , Charles Holten and Patrick Holten
Defendant:
Alexander Panio, Jr., Mary Panio, Adolescent and Family Institute of Colorado, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
