Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Zarlenga, et al v. US, et al
as 23-1221
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LORI ANN ZARLENGA, VICTORIA A. ZARLENGA, Decedent and LORI A. ZARLENGA
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES, GEORGE W. BUSH, individually and in his official capacity as President of the United States, BARACK OBAMA, individually and in his official capacity as President of the United States and others
Zarlenga, et al v. US, et al
as 23-1170
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LORI ANN ZARLENGA, VICTORIA A. ZARLENGA, Decedent and LORI A. ZARLENGA
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES, GEORGE W. BUSH, individually and in his official capacity as President of the United States, BARACK OBAMA, individually and in his official capacity as President of the United States and others
Zarlenga et al v. United States Of America et al
as 1:2022cv00372
Defendant:
Thrive Behavioral Health Center, Inc, United States Of America, George W. Bush and others
Plaintiff:
Lori A. Zarlenga and Victoria A. Zarlenga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc. v. Kelly et al
as 1:2017cv10094
Plaintiff:
The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Patrick Kelly and Patricia Nash-Power
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Silvestri v. Smith et al
as 1:2014cv13137
Plaintiff:
Mark Silvestri
Defendant:
James Smith, Patrick Kelly, George Kelsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Azubuko v. Parmarole et al
as 1:2012cv10409
Plaintiff:
Chukwuma E Azubuko
Defendant:
Michael J. Parmarole, Patricia G. Curtin, Patrick Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rothschild v. Rye Select Broad Market XL Fund, L.P. et al
as 1:2009cv10858
Plaintiff:
Lawrence J. Rothschild and Lawrence J. Rothschild
Defendant:
Rye Select Broad Market XL Fund, L.P., Tremont Partners, Inc., Tremont Partners, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 - Petition for Removal: SEC Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
