Cases 1 - 10 of 52
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv07804
Plaintiff:
PATRICK KING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Patrick King v. Mansfield University of Pennsylvania, et al
as 23-1708
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK KING
Defendant / Appellee:
MANSFIELD UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION, JOHN HALSTED and others
United States v. King
as 23-5031
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT PATRICK KING
Joseph v. Waushara County et al
as 1:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
Luke A Joseph
Defendant:
Waushara County, Donna Kalata, Mark S Piechowski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
King v. Ajanta Pharma USA, Inc. et al
as 9:2022cv81414
Plaintiff:
PATRICK KING
Defendant:
Ajanta Pharma USA, Inc., Apotex Corp., APPCO Pharma, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10448
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv12045
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv11856
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Clarke v. Antonini et al
as 7:2021cv01877
Defendant:
Det. Camilo R. Antonini, Det. Sgt. Sean J. Fegan, County Of Westchester and others
Plaintiff:
Henderson Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seward v. Antonini et al
as 7:2020cv09251
Defendant:
Det. Camilo R. Antonini, P.O. Robert G. Puff, Det. Sgt. Sean J. Fegan and others
Plaintiff:
Alan Seward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
