Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Lori Franklin v. Craig Greenburg, et al
as 25-5429
Plaintiff:
LORI MARIE FRANKLIN
Defendant:
CRAIG GREENBURG, PAUL HUMPHREY and LEIGH WHELAN-MARONI
Conover v. Greenberg et al
as 3:2025cv00116
Plaintiff:
Soojin Conover
Defendant:
Craig Greenberg, Paul Humphrey and Jeremy J. Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Greenberg et al
as 3:2024cv00653
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Government, Paul Humphrey, Russell Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Franklin v. Greenburg et al
as 3:2024cv00654
Defendant:
Leigh Whelan-Maroni, Paul Humphrey and Craig Greenburg
Plaintiff:
Lori Marie Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joseph v. Cummins et al
as 3:2024cv00587
Plaintiff:
Veronica Precious Joseph
Defendant:
Paul Humphrey, Unknown Defendant Male LMPD Officer 2, Unknown Defendant Male LMPD Officer 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Dib v. F4L Sports, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00595
Plaintiff:
Michael Dib
Defendant:
F4L Sports, Inc., Perk Fitness of Spring Lake, Inc., Fit4Life Franchising, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Michael DeSpain v. Louisville Metropolitan Government, et al
as 21-6237
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DESPAIN and MICHAEL R. DESPAIN
Defendant / Appellee:
LOUISVILLE METRO GOVERNMENT, STEVE CONRAD, Chief of Police, LIEUTENANT KIT STEMILE and others
Humphrey et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2020cv00019
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Plaintiff:
Paul Humphrey and Mary Humphrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. HUMPHREY et al
as 1:2019cv04950
Petitioner:
MYKEL EZRA SMITH
Respondent:
PAUL HUMPHREY and INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Humphrey et al v. Monsanto Company
as 1:2019cv02274
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Plaintiff:
Paul Humphrey and Mary Humphrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
