Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Burns v. GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv16328
Plaintiff:
Paul Burns
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC and GlaxoSmithKline PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Burns v. Conservice, LLC
as 5:2022cv01011
Plaintiff:
Paul Burns
Defendant:
Conservice, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
BURNS v. DIXON
as 3:2022cv17474
Petitioner:
PAUL BURNS
Respondent:
MARK S INCH and RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jordan v. Smith et al
as 1:2021cv01304
Plaintiff:
Ditarius Jordan
Defendant:
William Smith, Deniese Carter, Jodi King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2021cv02129
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, Tyco Fire Products LP and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Paul Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
William Robert Norrie v. Paul Burns et al
as 2:2021cv04871
Defendant:
John Pulos, The United States of America, Kelly Mallen and others
Plaintiff:
William Robert Norrie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burns v. The Kenan Advantage Group, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv01227
Defendant:
The Kenan Advantage Group, Inc. and Petro-Chemical Transport, LLC
Plaintiff:
Paul Burns
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
BURNS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv98378
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL BURNS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BURNS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv28467
Plaintiff:
BURNS and GEORGE PAUL BURNS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burns v. Progressive Casualty Ins. Co.
as 2:2019cv02336
Plaintiff:
Paul Burns
Defendant:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
