Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Cline v. USA
as 2:2023cv04110
Petitioner:
Dana Paul Cline
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
United States v. Dana Cline
as 23-1538
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Dana Paul Cline
United States v. Dana Cline
as 21-2933
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Dana Paul Cline
Paul Cline, et al v. Dart Transit Company, et al
as 21-3468
Defendant / Appellee:
DART TRANSIT COMPANY and SUSAN PRIEST RICHLAK, Administrator of the Estate of Richard M. Thompson, Jr., deceased
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL CLINE and JEANINE CLINE
Betts v. Smith
as 1:2021cv01136
Defendant:
Paul (I) Cline, Dean (I) Williams, Justin Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Betts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Folks v. Cline et al
as 1:2020cv02124
Defendant:
Paul (I) Cline, Guliford (I), Guliford and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Folks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Cline, et al v. Dart Transit Company, et al
as 19-3375
Defendant / Appellee:
DART TRANSIT COMPANY and SUSAN PRIEST RICHLAK, Administrator of the Estate of Richard M. Thompson, Jr., deceased
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL CLINE and JEANINE CLINE
Cline et al v. Dart Transit Company et al
as 5:2018cv00258
Plaintiff:
Paul Cline and Jeanine Cline
Defendant:
Dart Transit Company and Susan Priest Richlak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Copeland v. County of Chautauqua, et al
as 16-3322
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WESLEY G. COPELAND, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF CHAUTAUQUA, ROGER GOSSARD, District Court Judge, Montgomery County District Court, LARRY MARKLE, Montgomery County Attorney and others
Cline et al v. Carnival Corporation
as 1:2014cv20536
Plaintiff:
Starleen Cline , Paul Cline , Seth Tanner and others
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
