Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Ramzan v. Hares et al
as 2:2018cv13463
Defendant:
John Bennick, Paul Perry, Erin Burnett and others
Plaintiff:
Ari Ramzan
Perry v. Hooks et al
as 5:2017hc02072
Petitioner:
Paul Perry
Respondent:
Erik A. Hooks and Felix Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Price v. Thacker, et al
as 3:2015cv00231
Plaintiff:
Lawry Price
Defendant:
Sandra Thacker, Paul Perry and U. Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fred Douty v. David Ballard
as 15-6484
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRED D. DOUTY
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID BALLARD, Warden, Mt. Olive Correctional Complex, PAUL PERRY, Associate Warden of Security, Mt. Olive Correctional Complex, STEVE CAUDILL, Captain, Mt. Olive Correctional Complex and others
Rouse v. Thacker et al
as 1:2015cv00061
Plaintiff:
Stanley Bruce Rouse
Defendant:
Sandra Thacker, Paul Perry and Richard Comfort
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramsey v. Rubenstein et al
as 2:2014cv03434
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein , David Ballard , Andrew Hudson and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Allen Ramsey, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Ruebenstein et al
as 2:2013cv33339
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Taylor
Defendant:
Jim Ruebenstein , David Ballard , Paul Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douty v. Rubenstein et al
as 2:2013cv32832
Plaintiff:
Fred D. Douty
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein , David Ballard , Paul Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douty v. Ballard et al
as 2:2013cv24714
Plaintiff:
Fred D. Douty
Defendant:
David Ballard , Paul Perry , James Pennington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cedeal Harper v. Jason Collin
as 14-6506
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CEDEAL T. HARPER
Defendant - Appellee:
JASON COLLINS, Associate Warden of Programs, PAUL PERRY, Associate Warden of Security, DAVID BALLARD, Warden and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL BLAGG, Sergeant, LT. MARGARET CLIFFORD, Lieutenant and CAPTAIN JAMES MCCLOUD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
