Cases 41 - 50 of 94
Brunelle et al v. PeaceHealth et al
as 3:2022cv05499
Plaintiff:
Jessica Brunelle and Jonathan Adelstein
Defendant:
PeaceHealth and Robert Axelrod
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Peacehealth Networks On Demand, LLC v. ZoomCare365 Management Llc et al
as 7:2022cv05139
Plaintiff:
Peacehealth Networks On Demand, LLC d/b/a ZoomCare and Peacehealth Networks On Demand, LLC doing business as ZoomCare
Defendant:
ZoomCare365 Management Llc, ZoomCare365 FDB Llc, ZoomCare365 Holdings Llc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 cp Copyright Infringement
Parke Gordon, LLC v. PeaceHealth et al
as 6:2022cv00484
Plaintiff:
Parke Gordon, LLC
Defendant:
PeaceHealth and MRO Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Ullum v. PeaceHealth
as 3:2022cv05044
Plaintiff:
David Ullum
Defendant:
PeaceHealth
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
