Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Rueb, et al v. Zavaras, et al
as 11-1507
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTIN JOSEPH RUEB, AKA Justin J. Rueb, AKA Justin Rueb and JACOB OAKLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
ARISTEDES ZAVARAS, EUGENE ATHERTON, DR. CRANDELL and others
STEELE et al v. H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2011cv64641
Plaintiff:
RONALD J STEELE and PEGGY STEELE
Defendant:
H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rueb v. Zavaras, et al
as 11-1111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTIN JOSEPH RUEB, AKA Justin J. Rueb, AKA Justin Joseph Rueb
Defendant - Appellee:
ARISTEDES ZAVARAS, EUGENE ATHERTON, CRANDELL and others
Apodaca v. Zavaras, et al
as 10-1523
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVE APODACA
Defendant - Appellee:
ARISTEDES W. ZAVARAS, Executive Director of CDOC, SUSAN JONES, CDOC Warden, CSP, WILLIAM CLASPELL, Invesigator for Inspector General's Office, CDOC and others
Rueb et al v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2010cv02726
Plaintiff:
Justin Rueb and Jacob Oakley
Defendant:
Aristedes Zavaras, Eugene Atherton, Crandell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Apodaca v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2010cv00755
Plaintiff:
Steve Apodaca
Defendant:
Aristedes W. Zavaras, Susan Jones, William Claspell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rueb, et al v. Zavaras, et al
as 09-1313
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTIN JOSEPH RUEB, ALAN MEADS, GEORGE SHANKLIN and others
Plaintiff:
LEROY ARMIJO, CESAR CABRERA, JR., JORDON BURDEN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ARISTEDES ZAVARAS, BROWN (CAPTAIN), JOHN OR JANE DOE #3 and others
Apodaca v. Claspell et al
as 1:2009cv00284
Plaintiff:
Steve Apodaca
Defendant:
Bill Claspell and Peggy Steele
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rueb et al v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2009cv00072
Plaintiff:
Justin Rueb, Roy Hernandez, Cesar Cabrera, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Aristedes Zavaras, Brown, Dennis Burbank and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
