Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Martin v. Kentucky Registry of Election Finance
as 3:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Peppy Martin
Defendant:
Kentucky Registry of Election Finance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Kentucky Educational Television
as 3:2024cv00050
Defendant:
Kentucky Educational Television
Plaintiff:
Peppy Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Kentucky Registry of Election Finance
as 3:2024cv00047
Defendant:
Kentucky Registry of Election Finance
Plaintiff:
Peppy Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Martin v. City of Louisville, Kentucky
as 3:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Peppy Martin
Defendant:
City of Louisville, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accomodations)
Martin v. United States Postal Service
as 3:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Peppy Martin
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. State Farm Insurance Co.
as 3:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Peppy Martin
Defendant:
State Farm Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Martin v. U.S. Department of Transportation et al
as 1:2016cv00124
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Transportation , Kentucky Transportation Cabinet and Hart County Circuit Court
Plaintiff:
Peppy Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Peppy Martin v. CitiMortgage, Inc., et al
as 15-5338
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PEPPY MARTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC. and FARM CREDIT SERVICES OF MID-AMERICA FLCA
Martin v. Citimortgage et al
as 1:2014cv00134
Plaintiff:
Peppy Martin
Defendant:
Citimortgage and Farm Credit Services of Mid-America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martin v. Farm Credit Services of Mid-America FLCA et al
as 3:2010cv00543
Plaintiff:
Peppy Martin
Defendant:
Farm Credit Services of Mid-America FLCA and CitiMortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
