Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Michael Watkins, et al v. Kajima International, Inc., et al
as 12-6315
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL W. WATKINS and MICHAEL D. WATKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
KAJIMA INTERNATIONAL, INC., HIROAKI HOSHINO, CEO of U. S. Operations for Kajima Corporation, RONALD M. GEORGE, individually and in his offiicial capacity as Chief Justice of the California Supreme Court, City of Sacramento, California and others
Watkins et al v. Kajima Corporation et al
as 6:2012cv00515
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Watkins and Michael D. Watkins
Defendant:
Kajima Corporation, KUD International, Kajima Building & Design Group and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
In re: Peter H. Norell, Jr.
as 12-80045
Respondent:
In re: PETER NORELL, Admitted to the bar of the Ninth Circuit: June 28, 1994
Michael Watkins, et al v. Kajima International, Inc., et al
as 10-6289
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL W. WATKINS and MICHAEL D. WATKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
KAJIMA INTERNATIONAL, INC., HIROAKI HOSHINO, CEO of U. S. Operations for Kajima Corporation, RONALD M. GEORGE, individually and in his offiicial capacity as Chief Justice of the California Supreme Court, City of Sacramento, California and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-55309
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Watkins v. Kajima International Incorporated et al
as 3:2008cv00426
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Watkins
Defendant:
Kajima International Incorporated, Hiroaki Hoshino, Ronald M. George and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv00700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watkins et al v. Kajima International Incorporated et al
as 3:2007cv00423
Defendant:
Richard A. Belotti, California, State of, John Vega and others
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Watkins and Michael D. Watkins
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
