Cases 61 - 70 of 81
Tia v. Victory Ohana Does et al
as 1:2013cv00187
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Victory Ohana Does, Lyle Antonio, HCF MISHU Floorboy DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tia v. Sequeira et al
as 1:2013cv00179
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Francis X. Sequeira, Baker, Case Manager Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tia v. Espinda et al
as 1:2013cv00160
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Nolan Espinda, Dovie Borges, D. Amodeo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tia v. Suzuki et al
as 1:2013cv00157
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Russell A. Suzuki, Deputy Attorney General Loui, Office of the Ombudsman, State of Hawai'i and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tia v. Seabright et al
as 1:2013cv00118
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
James Michael Seabright, Lyle Antonio, Henry Hope and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tia v. Johnson et al
as 1:2013cv00110
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Tommy Johnson, Charles D. Sizemore and Jodie F. Maesaka Hirata
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tia v. Antonio et al
as 1:2013cv00075
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Lyle Antonio and Henry Hope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tia v. Kobayashi et al
as 1:2012cv00625
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Leslie E. Kobayashi, Michael A. Town, Joyce K. Matsumori-Hoshijo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tia v. Jones et al
as 1:2012cv00573
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Jones, Casey, Jodie Hirata and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tia v. Antonio et al
as 1:2012cv00488
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Lyle Antonio, Jodie Hirata, Nolan Espinda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
