Cases 1 - 10 of 10
USA v. Reich
as 22-10466
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Andrew Philip Reich
Sackos et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00058
Plaintiff:
Joshua Sackos , Christopher Marshall , Todd Briggs and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America Inc and Volkswagen A.G.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sackos et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al<font color
as MIE/2:15-cv-14074
Plaintiff:
Joshua Sackos , Christopher Marshall , Todd Briggs and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. and Volkswagen AG
Sackos et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv14074
Plaintiff:
Joshua Sackos , Christopher Marshall , Todd Briggs and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. and Volkswagen AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Produce West, Inc. v. Accel Services LLC et al
as 7:2015cv02784
Plaintiff:
Produce West, Inc.
Defendant:
Accel Services LLC and Philip Reich
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Tomato Mgmt., Corp. v. Accel Services LLC et al
as 7:2015cv01410
Plaintiff:
Tomato Mgmt., Corp.
Defendant:
Accel Services LLC and Philip Reich
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Metcalf v. Reich
as 5:2007cv02298
Plaintiff:
Ivan Metcalf
Defendant:
Philip Reich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Osborn et al
as 5:2007cv02147
Plaintiff:
Demetrick Deangelo Young
Defendant:
Jim Osborn, Philip Reich, Damion Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilbourn v. Reich
as 5:2007cv01957
Plaintiff:
Aaron Wilbourn, III
Defendant:
Philip Reich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilbourn v. Reich et al
as 5:2007cv01956
Petitioner:
Aaron Wilbourn, III
Respondent:
Philip Reich and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
