Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Henry v. Thompson
as 4:2023cv06113
Plaintiff:
Patrick Henry, III
Defendant:
Phillip E Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Raber v. Rhodes et al
as 9:2022cv03002
Plaintiff:
Aaron Vaughn Raber
Defendant:
Marcus D. Rhodes and Sheriff Phillip E. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Raymond v. Thompson et al
as 5:2020cv03074
Plaintiff:
Brandon Audrey Raymond
Defendant:
Director Marcus Rhodes and Sheriff Phillip E Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Johnson et al
as 4:2020cv01664
Plaintiff:
Clinton D Johnson, Jr and Kayzon Ru
Defendant:
Lt Jernigan, Officer Loutz, Ronald Hazzard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Osborn v. Horry County Police Department et al
as 4:2019cv02765
Defendant:
Horry County Sheriff's Department, Jeannette Benton, Chief Joe Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Hafida Osborn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bryant v. J Reuben Long Detention Center
as 6:2016cv02905
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bryant
Defendant:
J Reuben Long Detention Center, Phillipe E Thompson, Wayne M Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Charles Breslin, et al
as 13-1372
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: CHARLES B. BRESLIN, PAUL J. CUNNINGHAM and PHILLIP E. THOMPSON
Defendant - Respondent:
DICKISON TOWNSHIP, RAYMOND JONES, DANIEL WYRICK and others
Nominal Respondent:
LAWRENCE F STENGEL
Gerard v. Lee et al
as 4:2012cv02516
Plaintiff:
Arthur Gerard
Defendant:
Robert E Lee, Pamela J Jordan, Cynthia Graham Howe and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Knowlin v. Falvo et al
as 0:2012cv00852
Plaintiff:
Amon Knowlin
Defendant:
Sheila Falvo and Phillip E Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
