Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Brown v. Dunn et al
as 2:2019cv00091
Defendant:
Phyllis J. Billups, LaToya Strum, State of Alabama, Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan D. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shook v. Dunn et al
as 2:2018cv01048
Defendant:
Phyllis J. Billups, Jefferson Dunn, Corizon Correctional Healthcare and others
Plaintiff:
Annalisa Shook and Lisa Shook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Delaune v. Hutton et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00944
Plaintiff:
Roderick Delaune
Defendant:
John Hutton and Phyllis J Billups
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Delaune v. Hutton et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00517
Plaintiff:
Roderick Delaune
Defendant:
John Hutton and Phyllis J. Billups
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dean v. Billups et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2017cv00766
Plaintiff:
Dedric Jamar Dean
Defendant:
Phyllis J. Billups, Steven T. Marshall, The State of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Goldsmith v. Billups et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2017cv00754
Plaintiff:
Alfonzo Goldsmith, Jr.
Defendant:
Phyllis J. Billups, Charlotte Tesmer and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dean v. Billups et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2017cv00755
Plaintiff:
Dedric Jamar Dean
Defendant:
Ronald E. Nelson, Kirke Adams, Steven T. Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ambers v. Attorney General, State of Alabama et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2017cv00710
Plaintiff:
Marlon Jason Ambers
Defendant:
Phyllis J. Billups and Attorney General, State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kennedy v. Billups et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2017cv00157
Plaintiff:
Brandon Jemaul Kennedy
Defendant:
Phyllis J. Billups and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brooks v. Alabama Board and Pardon Parole Members et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2016cv00891
Plaintiff:
Willie A. Brooks, Jr.
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles , Phyllis J. Billups and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
