Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Barnett v. Pike County Circuit Court
as 5:2021cv00078
Plaintiff:
Bobby Keith Barnett
Defendant:
Pike County Circuit Court
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barnett v. Pike Cty Cir Ct
as 20-61108
Defendant / Appellee:
Davin Strong, R. Washington, Fred Gordon and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bobby Keith Barnett
Barnett v. Pike County Circuit Court et al
as 5:2020cv00137
Defendant:
Fred Gordon, D. Smith, Clerk Roger Graves and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Keith Barnett
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant

as 2:2020cv00162
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Wilke v. Tallahassee Memorial Hospital BHC et al

as 2:2019cv00426
Defendant:
John G. Roberts, Jr., 11th Circuit Court of Appeal, Judge Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Ayers Wilke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett v. Graves et al
as 5:2014cv00043
Plaintiff:
Bobby Keith Barnett
Defendant:
Roger A. Graves, Mike Smith, C.V. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barnett v. Graves et al
as 3:2014cv00403
Plaintiff:
Bobby Keith Barnett
Defendant:
Roger A. Graves, Mike Smith, C.V. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephen Sephus v. MS Department of Corrections, et al
as 12-60244
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN MICHAEL SEPHUS
Defendant - Appellee:
MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PIKE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, PIKE COUNTY JAIL and others
Sephus v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al

as 3:2012cv00050
Petitioner:
Stephen Michael Sephus
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Pike County Circuit Court, Pike County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sephus v. Miss. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 3:2011cv00684
Plaintiff:
Stephen Michael Sephus
Defendant:
Miss. Dept. of Corrections, Pike County Circuit Court, Pike County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.