Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv08892
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Pilot Thomas Logistics, et al
as 3:2022cv00117
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Defendant:
Pilot Thomas Logistics, Thomas West Fuels Lubricants and Chemicals, LLC, Simon Petroleum, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
KAT Industries, Inc. v. Maxum Enterprises, LLC
as 4:2021cv00067
Defendant:
Maxum Enterprises, LLC doing business as Pilot Thomas Logistics
Plaintiff:
KAT Industries, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00627
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
LLOYD v. PILOT THOMAS LOGISTICS
as 2:2019cv00929
Plaintiff:
JUAN LLOYD
Defendant:
PILOT THOMAS LOGISTICS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03315
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
AT&T Corp. v. CL Thomas Petroleum Inc. et al
as 6:2018cv00050
Defendant:
CL Thomas Petroleum Inc. and PILOT THOMAS LOGISTICS, LLC
Plaintiff:
AT&T CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Dwaine Ellender Family L L C v. Pilot Thomas Logistics L L C et al
as 2:2016cv01637
Plaintiff:
Dwaine Ellender Family L L C
Defendant:
Pilot Thomas Logistics L L C and Simons Petroleum L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Franklin et al v. Pilot Thomas Logistics, LLC
as 1:2016cv02043
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Franklin , Mike Monterro , Neimiah McGee and others
Defendant:
Pilot Thomas Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
