Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Rich v. Ceiss et al
as 5:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
JT Rich
Defendant:
Cortnie Ciess, Jerry Hurburger, Cheyenne Underwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kellogg v. Aguilera et al
as 5:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Kellogg
Defendant:
Tony Aguilera, Jace Gilley, Cole Jack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. Miller
as 5:2023cv01086
Petitioner:
Jeremiah Christain Pittman
Respondent:
Warden Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rich v. Baird et al
as 5:2023cv00883
Plaintiff:
JT Rich
Defendant:
Stephens County, Dexter Lawley, Cheyenne Underwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garrett v. Anderson et al
as 6:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Marvin Garrett
Defendant:
Jennifer M. Anderson, Errol R. Arthur, Julie Becker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 4:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Leran Pittman
Defendant:
USAA Casualty Insurance Company, United Services Automobile Association and USAA General Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Pittman v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2021cv01033
Plaintiff:
David Henry Pittman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Pittman v. LNU
as 5:2021cv00851
Petitioner:
Jeremiah Christain Pittman
Respondent:
FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pittman v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2021cv00693
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Christain Pittman
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ray v. Clardy et al
as 6:2020cv00471
Defendant:
Kevin Clardy, Citytellacoin, Tom Pittman and others
Plaintiff:
Eric S. Ray and Eric Shawn Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
