Cases 1 - 10 of 19
gomez et al v. Sekhon Carrier Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
ashley gomez, Hunter Chargois, Ruben Hernandez, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Sekhon Carrier Inc., United Specialty Insurance Company and Arshpreet Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Gomez et al v. United Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 3:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Ashley Gomez, Hunter Chargois, Ruben Hernandez and others
Defendant:
United Specialty Insurance Company, Sekhon Carrier, Inc. and Arshpreet Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Ponce-Currasco v. Martinez
as 2:2023cv01563
Plaintiff:
Javier Ponce and Javier Ponce-Currasco
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez and Filipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Torres Ponce v. Martinez
as 2:2023cv00444
Plaintiff:
Manuel De Jesus Torres-Ponce and Manuel De Jesus Torres Ponce
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ponce v. Intertek USA Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01686
Plaintiff:
Ruben Ponce, Jr.
Defendant:
Intertek USA Inc., Offshore Marine Contractors, Inc. and Arena Offshore LLC
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv09922
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Ponce v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv03263
Plaintiff:
Linda Ponce
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc. and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dixon v. General Motors Financial Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv04492
Plaintiff:
Landry Dixon
Defendant:
Daniel E. Berce , Steven P. Bowman , Chris A. Choate and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
