Cases 1 - 10 of 135
Galvan v. EFT Express SA de CV et al
as 5:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Juvenal Calvillo Galvan
Defendant:
EFT Express SA de CV and Hipolito Hernandez Ponce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lopez Ponce v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
MARIA ANGELINA LOPEZ PONCE
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Mason v. Rodrigue et al
as 1:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Rochon Lee Mason
Defendant:
Don Paul rodrique, Dupre Marine Transportation, LLC, Don Paul Rodrigue and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Rios v. Moron et al
as 5:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
FNU Moron, M. Williams, J. Ponce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios v. Burk et al
as 5:2023cv00305
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
FNU Burk, M. Williams, J. Ponce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ponce v. Community Action Corporation of South Texas et al
as 2:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
Ashley Ponce
Defendant:
Community Action Corporation of South Texas and Jim Wells County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rios v. Rowe et al
as 5:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Kelly S. Rowe, Gregory Rushin, Dan Corvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Ponce v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv03826
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Ponce
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
