Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Logan et al v. Oklahoma City Police Department et al
as 5:2023cv00804
Plaintiff:
El Cruz Logan
Defendant:
Oklahoma City Police Department, Jason Hodges, Daniel Ponder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ponder et al v. United States of America, The et al
as 4:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
Deborah Ponder and Micheal Ponder
Defendant:
The United States of America, Creek Nation Community Hospital, Regional Brain Institute, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Logan v. Oklahoma City Police Department et al
as 5:2022cv01083
Plaintiff:
EL C Logan
Defendant:
Oklahoma City Police Department, Jason Hodges, FNU Ponder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ponder et al v. United States of America, The et al
as 4:2022cv00513
Plaintiff:
Deborah Ponder and Michael Ponder
Defendant:
Creek Nation Community Hospital, United States of America, The, Regional Brain Institute, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Ponder v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company
as 1:2020cv00784
Plaintiff:
Marissa V. Ponder
Defendant:
USAA Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Oravetz et al v. Berexco LLC et al
as 5:2019cv00649
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Simon, Janice Montgomery, Harold Langley and others
Defendant:
Mid-Con Energy Operating LLC, Does 1-25, White Star Petroleum LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
N. et al v. Alamogordo Police Department et al
as 2:2018cv00173
Defendant:
Alamogordo Police Department, Keith Daron Syling, Michael Lawrence and others
Plaintiff:
A. N. and Katherine Ponder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
