Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02381
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Maloney et al v. Potestivo & Associates PC et al
as 1:2017cv01355
Plaintiff:
Eileen Maloney and Lawrence T. Maloney
Defendant:
Potestivo & Associates PC and RBS Citizens Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv11223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv09735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bambas v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv15161
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc. , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. ("MERS") , Potestivo & Associates, PC and others
Plaintiff:
Michael-Edmund Bambas
Bambas v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv15111
Plaintiff:
Michael Edmund Bambas
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc., Potestivo & Associates, PC, Orlans & Associates, PC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crawford et al v. Bank of America N.A. et al
as 2:2011cv13658
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Crawford , Angela Copeland , Rhonda Lagarde and others
Defendant:
Bank of America N.A. , BAC Home Loan Servicing, L.P. , JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Krantz et al v. CitiMortgage, Inc et al
as 2:2011cv10371
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc and Potestivo & Associates, PC
Plaintiff:
Alicia L. Krantz and Charles L. Krantz
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
