Cases 1 - 10 of 14
BKK Working Group v. 1700 Santa Fe Ltd et al
as 2:2018cv05810
Defendant:
A.C. Barrel & Drum, A.J. Daw Printing Ink Corp., A.D. Service Publications and others
Plaintiff:
BKK Working Group, Rohr, Inc., California Resources Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Intepro America, LP v. Power-One, Inc.
as 8:2014cv00712
Plaintiff:
Intepro America, LP
Defendant:
Power-One, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv03291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Munjal Mehta v. Power-One Inc et al
as 2:2013cv04631
Plaintiff:
Munjal Mehta and Jim Crehan
Defendant:
Power-One Inc, Richard J Thompson, Jon Gacek and others
SynQor, Inc. et al v. Artesyn Technologies, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00444
Plaintiff:
SynQor, Inc.
Defendant:
Artesyn Technologies, Inc. , Astec America, Inc. , Bel Fuse Inc. and others
Respondent:
Cisco Systems, Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
SYNQOR, INC. V. ARTESYN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
as 11-1191
Defendant-Appellant:
Artesyn Technologies, Inc., Astec America, Inc., Bel Fuse, Inc. and others
Plaintiff-Appellee:
SynQor, Inc. and SynQor, Inc.
Intersil Americas Inc v. Power-One, Inc.
as 2:2009cv00281
Plaintiff:
Intersil Americas Inc
Defendant:
Power-One, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
POWER-ONE V ARTESYN TECHNOLOGIES
as 08-1501
Defendant-Appellant:
Artesyn Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Power-One, Inc.
SynQor, Inc. v. Artesyn Technologies, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv00497
Plaintiff:
SynQor, Inc.
Defendant:
Artesyn Technologies, Inc., Astec America, Inc., Emerson Network Power, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Astec America Inc. v. Power-One Inc. et al
as 6:2007cv00464
Plaintiff:
Astec America Inc.
Defendant:
Power-One Inc. and Does
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
