Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Gibens et al v. United States Congress et al
as 2:2019cv00191
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service, Hoist Liftruck Mfg LLC, Woodforest National Bank and others
Defendant:
Premier Credit of North America LLC, Porter County Circuit Court Judge Pro Tem, Carrie N Crider and others
Plaintiff:
Reactive Power LLC and John Gibens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00417
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00837
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
BELL v. PREMIERE CREDIT OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00577
Plaintiff:
JULIE A. BELL
Defendant:
ECMC HOLDINGS CORPORATION and PREMIERE CREDIT OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00644
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hector Huertas v. US Dept Ed
as 10-3386
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HECTOR L. HUERTAS
Defendant - Appellee:
US DEPT ED, DIANE SPADONI, Director, Customer Care Group. Borrower Services, in her official and individual capacity, PREMIER CREDIT OF NORTH AMERICA LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00421
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
