Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Smith v. NetSpend Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Prentis Earl Smith, II
Defendant:
NetSpend Corporation and Netspend Legal Dept
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
McDuffie v. Baker et al
as 5:2024ct03042
Plaintiff:
Prentis McDuffie
Defendant:
Matthew Baker and Russell Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Marion County
as 23-40151
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Prentis Earl Smith, II
Defendant / Appellee:
Marion County Sheriff's Office, Sheriff David McKnight, Jefferson Police Department and others
Rupert v. St. Lucie County Jail et al
as 2:2020cv14183
Defendant:
St. Lucie County Jail, Chaplain John Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Prentis Rupert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fitzgerald v. Walsh et al
as 2:2019cv01818
Defendant:
Adams, Prentis, Haling and others
Plaintiff:
Marty Scott Fitzgerald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith, II v. Marion County Jail et al
as 4:2019cv00719
Plaintiff:
Prentis Earl Smith, II
Defendant:
Marion County Sheriff's Office, Marion County Jail and Marion County District Clerk's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Marion County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2018cv00345
Plaintiff:
Prentis Earl Smith, II
Defendant:
Jefferson Police Department, Sheriff David McKnight, Marion County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Rogers et al
as 4:2018cv00385
Plaintiff:
Esker Martin, III
Defendant:
Vamesha Rogers, Ebonee Bryant, Orlando Newburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rupert v. Boyd et al
as 3:2017cv00119
Plaintiff:
Prentis Rupert
Defendant:
Marty Boyd , Keith Bowers and Fears
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rupert v. Boyd et al
as 3:2017cv00092
Plaintiff:
Prentis Rupert
Defendant:
Marty Boyd and Bower
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
