Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Gregg v. Louisville Metro Government et al
as 3:2008cv00604
Plaintiff:
Robert Gregg
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Government, Tom Campbell and Prison Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shearer et al v. Louisville Metro Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2008cv00242
Plaintiff:
Jeremy L. Shearer and Alicia Nix
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Department of Corrections, Louisville-Jefferson County Metro Government LMPD (Public Integrity Unit), Carla Rowe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gibbons v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2007cv00697
Plaintiff:
Gerald Gibbons
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, John Rees, George Million and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Shaffer v. Campbell et al
as 3:2007cv00630
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Shaffer
Defendant:
Tom D. Campbell, Prison Health Services, Inc., Edgars and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sherley v. Jefferson County Government et al
as 3:2007cv00355
Plaintiff:
Frank R. Sherley
Defendant:
Jefferson County Government, Prison Health Services, Inc., Correctional Medical Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Prison Health Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00293
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wayne Allen
Defendant:
Prison Health Services, Inc., Patricia Keeling and Alicia Kelley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
O'Rafferty v. McDonald et al
as 3:2007cv00145
Petitioner:
Robert O'Rafferty
Respondent:
Martin McDonald and Louisville Metro Corrections Prison Health Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Barnard v. Beckstrom et al
as 0:2007cv00019
Plaintiff:
Ricky L. Barnard
Defendant:
Gary Beckstrom, Prison Health Services, Inc.,, Prison Health Services, Inc., and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
