Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Fixed Income Shares: Series M v. Citibank, N.A.
as 18-1196
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Fixed Income Shares: Series M, LVS II LLC, PCM Fund, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Citibank, N.A.
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA et al v. VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 3:2018cv01223
Plaintiff:
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA , PRUDENTIAL RETIREMENT INSURANCE AND ANNUITY COMPANY , PRUDENTIAL TRUST COMPANY and others
Defendant:
VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC., J. MICHAEL PEARSON and HOWARD B. SCHILLER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
The Prudential Insurance Company of America et al v. Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. et al
as 1:2016cv07192
Plaintiff:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America , Prudential Retirement Insurance & Annuity Company , Prudential Trust Company and others
Defendant:
Petroleo Brasileiro S.A., Petrobras International Finance Company S.A. and Petrobras Global Finance B.V.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
POTTER v. VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 3:2015cv07658
Petitioner:
Miami Fire Fighters' and Police Officers' Retirement Trust, Paul Alvater, California Public Employees Retirement System and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
MULTI-STRATEGY MASTER FUND LIMITED, BLACKROCK CREDIT ALPHA MASTER FUND, L.P., LORD ABBETT BOND-DEBENTURE FUND, INC. and others
Defendant:
THEO MELAS-KYRIAZI, PHILIDOR NETWORK ENTITIES, VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
TIMBER HILL LLC, LAURA POTTER and CITY OF TUCSON TOGETHER WITH AND ON BEHALF OF THE TUCSON SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Special Master:
HON. DENNIS M. CAVANAUGH, RET.
Not Classified By Court:
Cathy Lochridge
Amicus Curiae:
Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association
Lead Plaintiff:
TIAA-CREF
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
FIXED INCOME SHARES: SERIES M et al v. Citibank N.A. et al
as 1:2014cv09373
Plaintiff:
FIXED INCOME SHARES: SERIES M , LVS II LLC , PCM Fund, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Citibank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
PRUDENTIAL INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOS 2 et al v. BANK OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2014cv04242
Plaintiff:
PRUDENTIAL INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOS 2 and THE PRUDENTIAL SERIES FUND
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA , NATIONAL ASSOCIATION , ASSET BACKED FUNDING CORPORATION , BANC OF AMERICA MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
The Prudential Life Insurance, et al v. Countrywide Financial Corp, et al
as 14-55660
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THE PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD., THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, PRUCO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC., COUNTRYWIDE SECURITIES CORPORATION and others
THE PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. et al v. COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORP. et al
as 2:2013cv05883
Defendant:
Bank of America Corp, Bank of America N.A., Barclays Capital Inc and others
Plaintiff:
PRU ALPHA FIXED INCOME OPPORTUNITY MASTER FUND I, L.P., PRUDENTIAL INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOS 2, PRUDENTIAL RETIREMENT INSURANCE & ANNUITY COMPANY and others
THE PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. et al v. COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORP. et al
as 2:2013cv01992
Plaintiff:
THE PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. , THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA , PRUCO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORP. , COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC. , COUNTRYWIDE SECURITIES CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 - Petition for Removal: Securities Fraud
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA et al v. BANK OF AMERICA, et al
as 2:2013cv01586
Plaintiff:
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA , COMMERCE STREET INVESTMENTS, LLC , PARK PLACE COMMERCE INVESTMENTS, LLC and others
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION , ASSET BACKED FUNDING CORPORATION , BANK OF AMERICA MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
