Cases 1 - 10 of 258
Liggon-Redding v. Public Storage
as 1:2025cv00778
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Liggon-Redding
Defendant:
Public Storage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Williams, et al. v. California Civil Rights Department, et al.
as 25-2426
Plaintiff:
G. GREGORY WILLIAMS, an individual and PLERNPIT POLPANTU, an individual
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA CIVIL RIGHTS DEPARTMENT, a government agency, BRYANA HOLGUIN, a State official, LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, a government agency and others
Jeanpierre v. Public Storage et al
as 2:2025cv00287
Plaintiff:
Brandon Michael Jeanpierre
Defendant:
Public Storage, Public Storage OP and Public Storage Operating Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (religion)
Blassingame v. Public Storage, Inc.
as 1:2025cv00930
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Blassingame
Defendant:
Public Storage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Kelly v. Public Storage et al
as 4:2024cv01590
Defendant:
Breanna Roth, Public Storage and James DeMarco
Plaintiff:
Robert Keith Kelly
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Bryant v. Amtrak et al
as 1:2024cv05403
Defendant:
Willie Copeland, All Airlines, Extra Space Storage and others
Plaintiff:
Brenda Butler Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
U-Haul International Incorporated v. Public Storage Operating Company
as 2:2024cv03160
Defendant:
Public Storage Operating Company
Plaintiff:
U-Haul International Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Vowels v. Public Storage
as 3:2024cv00564
Defendant:
Public Storage
Plaintiff:
Lesley Vowels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Myers v. Atlanta Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv04246
Defendant:
John Doe Officer #5, Jane Doe 911 Operator #2, John Doe Officer #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Josiah W. Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
