Cases 41 - 50 of 338
PUTMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv04139
Plaintiff:
ADAM PUTMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gerac v. Putman et al
as 1:2022cv00066
Plaintiff:
Mary Gerac
Defendant:
Theodore Putman, Phillip Block and Good Deal Trucking, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v ROBERT HOYT PUTMAN, et al
as 7:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
ROBERT HOYT PUTMAN and ROLLIEGH HIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
PUTMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv04526
Plaintiff:
RICKY PUTMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PUTMAN v. PRETRIAL SERVICES et al
as 1:2021cv03210
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR N. PUTMAN
Defendant:
PRETRIAL SERVICES, PKECHIC NWAWUCI, TIM FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2021cv03882
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co., Buckeye Fire Equipment Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Kim Barrett, Ashley Boulafentis, Zack Burtt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barrett et al v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2021cv00175
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., Buckeye Fire Equipment Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Kim Barrett, Ashley Boulafentis, Zack Burtt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Putman v. WinCo Holdings, Inc.
as 2:2021at00912
Plaintiff:
Geneva Putman
Defendant:
WinCo Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Putman v. WinCo Holdings, Inc.
as 2:2021cv01760
Plaintiff:
Geneva Putman
Defendant:
WinCo Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
