Cases 31 - 40 of 16,062
PICKETT v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60118
Plaintiff:
ROBERT PICKETT
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YATES v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60122
Plaintiff:
DAVID YATES
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60084
Plaintiff:
DONN D. JOHNSON
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AUSTIN v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60064
Plaintiff:
CARROLL AUSTIN
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROADNAX v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60078
Plaintiff:
WARREN BROADNAX
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARVEY v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60125
Plaintiff:
JOHN HARVEY
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAUER v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60051
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BAUER
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAPPELL v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60065
Plaintiff:
JOHN G. CAPPELL, SR.
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARLEY v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60109
Plaintiff:
LEWIS BARLEY
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RICHARDS v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60074
Plaintiff:
HERBERT RICHARDS
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
