Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Joseph Anderson v. James Dzurenda, et al
as 21-16549
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH M. ANDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES DZURENDA, IAN E. CARR, K. THOMAS and others
Jocquise Coleman v. Greg Cox, et al
as 19-15254
Defendant:
RUSSELL, E. K. MCDANIEL, QUINTIN BYRNE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOCQUISE COLEMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
STACY BARRETT, CHAD SMITH, CCS1, BRIAN SANDOVAL, 2 AC and others
Kamedula v. Carr et al
as 3:2018cv00544
Defendant:
Nate Wake, Barbara Cegavske, Adam Laxalt and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Kamedula
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2018cv00426
Defendant:
Eldon K McDaniel, Rusti Donnelly, V. Austin and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph M Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Cox et al
as 3:2016cv00708
Defendant:
Stacy Barrett, Quintin Byrne, Greg J. Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Jocquise Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Espinosa v. Carpenter et al
as 3:2016cv00573
Defendant:
Quintin Byrne, Tara Carpenter, James Dzurenda and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin W. Espinosa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steven Halverson v. Quintin Byrne, et al
as 16-16686
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVEN R. HALVERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
QUINTIN BYRNE and NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Halverson v. Byrne et al
as 3:2016cv00025
Respondent:
Quintin Byrne and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Steven R. Halverson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lance Reberger v. Renee Baker, et al
as 13-17135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LANCE REBERGER
Defendant - Appellee:
RENEE BAKER, ADAM WATSON, MICHAEL BYRNE, Administrative Law Judge and others
Reberger v. Baker et al
as 3:2013cv00378
Defendant:
Renee Baker, Bruce Bannister, Mr. Baze and others
Plaintiff:
Lance Reberger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
