Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Quicken Loans Inc. v. Nationwide Biweekly Administration, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv13431
Plaintiff:
Quicken Loans Inc.
Defendant:
Nationwide Biweekly Administration, Inc. and Loan Payment Administration LLC
Gardner v. Quicken Loans, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv12720
Defendant:
Quicken Loans, Inc. , Potestivo & Associates, P.C. and Flagstar Bank, FSB
Plaintiff:
Nancy Gardner
Cheatom v. Quicken Loans Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv12440
Defendant:
Quicken Loans Inc. , Rock Financial, Bank of America and others
Plaintiff:
Benita M Cheatom
Renner et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. ("MERS") et al
as 4:2012cv14593
Plaintiff:
James Renner and Janelle Renner
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. ("MERS") , Quicken Loans, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association
Green et al v. OneWest Bank, FSB et al
as 2:2012cv14369
Plaintiff:
Daryl Alan Green and Melanie Rae Green
Defendant:
OneWest Bank, FSB , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and Quicken Loans, Inc.
Rea et al v. Indymac Mortgage Services
as 2:2012cv13440
Plaintiff:
David Rea and Kristen Rea
Defendant:
IndyMac Mortgage Services, Quicken Loans Inc. , Fannie Mae and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv11685
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Sikora et al v. Trott & Trott PC et al
as 2:2011cv11245
Plaintiff:
DAVID R SIKORA and KATERYNA D SIKORA
Defendant:
Trott & Trott PC , Quicken Loans Inc., Federal National Mortgage Association and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Knight v. Quicken Loans, Inc.
as 2:2010cv14147
Plaintiff:
Tiyanna Knight
Defendant:
Quicken Loans, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Falconer et al v. Quicken Loans, Inc.
as 2:2010cv14105
Plaintiff:
James H. Falconer and Klmmala Greene
Defendant:
Quicken Loans, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
