Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Paskenta Bd of Nomlaki Indians, et al v. Ines Crosby, et al
as 15-16654
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PASKENTA BAND OF NOMLAKI INDIANS and PASKENTA ENTERPRISES CORPORATION
Defendant / Appellee:
INES CROSBY, JOHN CROSBY, LESLIE LOHSE and others
Amanda Hill, et al v. Quicken Loans, LLC
as 20-55924
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AMANDA HILL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
QUICKEN LOANS, LLC, FKA Quicken Loans Inc.
Plaintiff:
GAYLE HYDE
Daniel Amador v. Quicken Loans Inc., et al
as 18-16331
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL AMADOR
Defendant - Appellee:
QUICKEN LOANS INC., BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Successor by Merger to BAC Home Loan Servicing, LP formerly known as Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP, NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC and others
Daniel Amador v. USDC-CAFR
as 18-71428
:
In re: DANIEL AMADOR
Petitioner:
DANIEL AMADOR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest:
QUICKEN LOANS INC., BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Successor by Merger to BAC Home Loan Servicing, LP formerly known as Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP, NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC and others
Ricardo Gomez v. Quicken Loans, Inc.
as 13-56084
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICARDO GOMEZ, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
QUICKEN LOANS, INC.
Hypertouch, Inc. v. Azoogle.com, Inc., et al
as 09-15943
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HYPERTOUCH, INC., a California corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
AZOOGLE.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation, DBA Epic Advertising, Inc., QUICKEN LOANS, INC., a Michigan corporation and SUBSCRIBERBASE, INC., a South Carolina corporation, DBA Addrive.com, DBA Consumer Research Corporation, Inc., DBA Free Slide, Inc., DBA Subsriberbase Holdings, Inc.
Quicken Loans Inc. v. Bennett Haselton, et al
as 08-80202
Petitioner:
QUICKEN LOANS INC., a Michigan Corporation
Respondent:
BENNETT HASELTON, an individual and PEACEFIRE INC., a Washington corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
