Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Paskenta Bd of Nomlaki Indians, et al v. Ines Crosby, et al
as 15-16654
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PASKENTA BAND OF NOMLAKI INDIANS and PASKENTA ENTERPRISES CORPORATION
Defendant / Appellee:
INES CROSBY, JOHN CROSBY, LESLIE LOHSE and others
Amanda Hill, et al v. Quicken Loans, LLC
as 20-55924
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AMANDA HILL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
QUICKEN LOANS, LLC, FKA Quicken Loans Inc.
Plaintiff:
GAYLE HYDE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Violation of Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Amanda Hill v. Quicken Loans Inc.
as 5:2019cv00163
Defendant:
Quicken Loans Inc.
Plaintiff:
Amanda Hill and Gayle Hyde
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Mattson v. Quicken Loans, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00989
Plaintiff:
Erik Mattson
Defendant:
Quicken Loans, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
HouseCanary, Inc. v. Quicken Loans Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01672
Plaintiff:
HouseCanary, Inc.
Defendant:
Quicken Loans Inc., In-House Realty, LLC and One Reverse Mortgage, LLC
Daniel Amador v. USDC-CAFR
as 18-71428
:
In re: DANIEL AMADOR
Petitioner:
DANIEL AMADOR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest:
QUICKEN LOANS INC., BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Successor by Merger to BAC Home Loan Servicing, LP formerly known as Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP, NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC and others
HouseCanary, Inc. v. Quicken Loans Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv01672
Plaintiff:
HouseCanary, Inc.
Defendant:
Quicken Loans Inc. , One Reverse Mortgage, LLC and In-House Realty, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Mattson v. Quicken Loans, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01840
Plaintiff:
Erik Mattson
Defendant:
New Penn Financial, LLC, Quicken Loans, Inc., United Mortgage Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
