Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Felisa Todd v. Rocket Mortgage, LLC et al
as 5:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Felisa Todd
Defendant:
Rocket Mortgage, LLC, Clear Recon Corp., Quicken Loans, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
D C Snyder v. Rocket Mortgage, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv03840
Defendant:
Rocket Mortgage, LLC, Quicken Loans, Inc. and Quicken Loans, LLC, Rocket Companies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
D C Snyder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Scott Fineberg et al v. Quicken Loans Inc et al
as 2:2021cv08488
Plaintiff:
Scott Fineberg, Frank Acuna and The Frank Anthony Acuna And Leonard Scott Fineberg Living Trust
Defendant:
Quicken Loans Inc, DOES 1-100 and Does 1-100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Violation of Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Frank A. Acuna et al v. Quicken Loans Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv10056
Defendant:
Newrez LLC, DOES 1-10 inclusive, Quicken Loans Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Frank A. Acuna and Leonard Scott Fineberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Moni-Alina Weber v. Quicken Loans, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00767
Plaintiff:
Moni Alina Weber
Defendant:
Quicken Loans, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Amanda Hill v. Quicken Loans Inc.
as 5:2019cv00163
Defendant:
Quicken Loans Inc.
Plaintiff:
Amanda Hill and Gayle Hyde
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Carlos V. Farias v. Quicken Loans, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv00524
Defendant:
Does and Quicken Loans, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carlos V. Farias
Julie Orsatti v. Quicken Loans Inc.
as 2:2015cv09380
Plaintiff:
Julie Orsatti
Defendant:
Quicken Loans Inc.
Narvelle Pledger Sr v. Quicken Loans Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv02105
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, Bank of America, NA, Does 1 through 100 and others
Plaintiff:
Narvelle Pledger, Sr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
