Cases 1 - 10 of 12
QUICKEN LOANS INC. v. GILLESPIE et al
as 3:2020cv01260
Plaintiff:
QUICKEN LOANS INC.
Defendant:
KENNETH E. GILLESPIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
QUICKEN LOANS INC. v. RIGOLIZZO
as 1:2019cv18668
Defendant:
MICHAEL RIGOLIZZO
Plaintiff:
QUICKEN LOANS INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.19 ACRES IN KINGWOOD TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1016-26-16 et al
as 3:2018cv01986
Plaintiff:
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.19 ACRES IN KINGWOOD TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1016-26-16, VINCENT DEGRADO, CATHERINE DEGRADO and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
ALLEN v. QUICKEN LOANS INC. et al
as 2:2017cv12352
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALLEN
Defendant:
QUICKEN LOANS INC. and NAVISTONE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511
WOLKOFF v. QUICKEN LOANS, INC.
as 2:2017cv00260
Plaintiff:
MAXX WOLKOFF
Defendant:
QUICKEN LOANS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
VAN DYK et al v. QUICKEN LOANS, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv05463
Plaintiff:
RONALD VAN DYK and JEAN VAN DYK
Defendant:
QUICKEN LOANS, INC., JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. , MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv06121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv03739
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
GRUBY et al v. QUICKEN LOANS, INC.
as 2:2014cv05912
Plaintiff:
SCOTT GRUBY , SUSAN NEUHAUS , ADAM RITTENHOUSE and others
Defendant:
QUICKEN LOANS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
VILINSKY et al v. QUICKEN LOANS, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv04363
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY VILINSKY and PNINA VILINSKY
Defendant:
QUICKEN LOANS, INC., CITIMORTGAGE INC. , PENNYMAC CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
