Cases 1 - 10 of 203
Robinson v. Silva et al
as 3:2024cv02154
Plaintiff:
Calvin Maron Robinson
Defendant:
Phillipe Silva, Quines, III, Sgt. Reynoso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Barnett
as 24-10257
Plaintiff:
Marcus Quin Butler
Defendant:
Tasha Barnett, Property Officer, John Middleton Unit, Rachel M. Anderson, Property Officer, John Middleton Unit and Bryan L. Williams, Head Warden, John Middleton Unit
Milgrim v. Garcia, et al.
as 24-1836
Plaintiff:
JARED RYAN MILGRIM, an individual
Defendant:
ALFREDO GARCIA, an individual, KIRAN KAMAT, an individual, ELAIN LEVY, an individual and others
Huzhou Chuangtai Rongyuan Investment Management Partnership et al v. Hui Qin et al
as 1:2024cv02219
Defendant:
Judgement-Debtor Hui Qin, Duo Liu, Xueyuan Han and others
Plaintiff:
Huzhou Chuangtai Rongyuan Investment Management Partnership, Huzhou Huihengying Equity Investment Partnership and Huzhou Huirongsheng Equity Investment Partnership
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Simpson-Quin v. 19 India Fee Owner, LLC
as 1:2024cv02123
Plaintiff:
Lucien Simpson-Quin
Defendant:
19 India Fee Owner, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 rl Diversity-Rent Lease & Ejectment
Hodge v. White et al
as 2:2024cv02179
Plaintiff:
James Albert Hodge
Defendant:
Quin White and New Era Transport, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Butler v. Cummings
as 1:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Marcus Quin Butler
Defendant:
Sam R Cummings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv00497
Petitioner:
Marcus Quin Butler
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Quine v. Ola et al
as 5:2024cv01202
Petitioner:
Shiloh Heavenly Quine
Respondent:
A. Ola, A. De La Cruz and A. Padilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
