Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Acosta v. Slocumb Law Firm, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00145
Plaintiff: R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant: Slocumb Law Firm, LLC and Michael W. Slocumb
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Scott Smith Roofing, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018mc00002
Plaintiff: R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant: Scott Smith Roofing, Inc. and Wayne Smith
Acosta v. Plantation Sweets, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2018cv00008
Plaintiff: R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant: Plantation Sweets, Inc. and Ronald Collins
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Kirkeide et al
as 9:2018cv80071
Plaintiff: R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant: Kevin G Kirkeide, Harry Sargeant, IOTC Financial Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
In Re: Inspection of the work establishment known as Peacock Timber Company, Inc. (JOINT ASSIGN)
as 2:2017mc03805
Movant: R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
Acosta v. Eagle Eye Communications, LLC
as 1:2017mi00083
Petitioner: R. Alexander Acosta
Respondent: Eagle Eye Communications, LLC
Acosta v. Phone City Birmngham LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01776
Defendant: Hussam Bakr, Phone City Birmngham LLC and Phone City Birmngham LLC d/b/a Cricket Wireless
Plaintiff: R Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Mosley et al
as 1:2017cv00436
Plaintiff: R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant: Tim Mosley and Melvin Pierce Painting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Lovett
as 8:2017mc00090
Petitioner: R. Alexander Acosta
Respondent: William H. Lovett, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Administrative Subpoena
Acosta v. Noble Gardens of Jacksonville, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00866
Plaintiff: R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant: Noble Gardens of Jacksonville, LLC, Noble House of Jacksonville, LLC, Ben Tingle and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?