Cases 1 - 10 of 295
R&P TECHNOLOGIES INC v. HAYCOX
as 2:2024cv01311
Plaintiff:
R&P TECHNOLOGIES INC
Defendant:
TAYLOR HAYCOX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
P. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
R. P.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Palani Karupaiyan, et al v. USA, et al
as 24-1044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PALANI KARUPAIYAN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
P. P., Plaintiff Palani Karupaiyan's son and R. P., Plainitff Palani Karupaiyan's daughter
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ameris Bank et al v. R&P Contractors LLC et al
as 8:2023cv02431
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation Ameris Bank a Georgia state chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation and Ameris Bank a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant:
R&P Contractors LLC and Rolando Alfonso Pineda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Harris v. R P D C et al
as 3:2023cv01669
Plaintiff:
Tervorious Q Harris
Defendant:
Richland Parish Detention Center, Mr Boone and R P D C
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palani KarupaiyanIn re: Palani Karupaiyan
as 23-3044
Petitioner:
In re: PALANI KARUPAIYAN
Plaintiff:
P. P. and R. P.
Respondent:
TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES, (TCS), RAJESH GOPINATHAN, individually and in his official capacity as MD, CEP of the TCS, TATA GROUP OF COMPANIES and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SUBRAMANIAN RAMADORAI, individually and in his official capacity, ex CEO/MD of the TCS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
