Cases 1 - 10 of 115
(PC) Ellis v. Crivello et al
as 2:2024cv00752
Plaintiff:
Benjamin F. Ellis
Defendant:
S. Crivello, J. Schultz, R. Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Birmele v. Ramos et al
as 8:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
John Birmele
Defendant:
Correction Officer R Ramds, Correction Officer J. Hunter, Correction Officer R. Doll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demetrios McNeill v. Warden R. Ramos
as 23-6488
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEMETRIOS DONELL MCNEILL
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN R. RAMOS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Elvin Irizarry v. R. Ramos
as 23-6456
Petitioner / Appellant:
ELVIN IRIZARRY
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN R. RAMOS
Churuk v. Ramos
as 3:2023cv00213
Petitioner:
Yarslov Churuk
Respondent:
R Ramos and R. Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Anthony Andrews v. R. Ramos
as 23-6145
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY ANDREWS
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN R. RAMOS
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Wine & Corks LLC et al
as 6:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Wine & Corks LLC doing business as Wine & Corks, Maria R. Ramos and Raymond Ramos
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Federal Communications Act
THOMPSON v. D. KIMBROUGH et al
as 2:2022cv04053
Plaintiff:
ELIJAH THOMPSON
Defendant:
D. KIMBROUGH, BURROUGHS, R. RAMOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Ramos
as 5:2022hc02154
Petitioner:
Daniel H. King
Respondent:
Warden R. Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McNeill v. Ramos et al
as 5:2022hc02134
Petitioner:
Demetrios Donell McNeill
Respondent:
Warden R. Ramos and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
