Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv30059
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
In re: DISH Network L.L.C. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-148
Respondent: BROADBAND ITV, INC.
Petitioner: In re: DISH NETWORK L.L.C., R STREET INSTITUTE, HIGH TECH INVENTORS ALLIANCE and others
R Street Institute v. Rizer d/b/a ARrow Consulting, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00401
Defendant: Arthur Rizer d/b/a ARrow Consulting, LLC and Rizer Consulting, LLC
Plaintiff: R Street Institute
Kelvin Jones, et al v. Governor of Florida, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-12003
Not Classified By Court: SERVICE, STATE OF NEBRASKA, THE STATE OF ARKANSAS and others
Defendant / Appellant: GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and FLORIDA SECRETARY OF STATE
Plaintiff / Appellee: LUIS A MENDEZ, CURTIS BRYANT, LEE HOFFMAN and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF ALABAMA
Alasaad, et al v. Wolf, et al
as 20-1081
Interested Party: REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, CONSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY CENTER, R STREET INSTITUTE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JEREMIE DUPIN, AARON GACH, NADIA ALASAAD and others
Defendant / Appellee: MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity, CHAD WOLF, Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, in his official capacity and MARK A. MORGAN, Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, in his official capacity
Plaintiff: TECHFREEDOM
Defendant / Appellant: MARK A. MORGAN, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity and CHAD WOLF, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellee: SUHAIB ALLABABIDI
Alasaad, et al v. Wolf, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1077
Plaintiff / Appellee: MATTHEW WRIGHT, NADIA ALASAAD, MOHAMMED AKRAM SHIBLY and others
Interested Party: REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, R STREET INSTITUTE, CENTER FOR DEMOCRACY & TECHNOLOGY and others
Defendant / Appellant: THOMAS D. HOMAN, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, in his official capacity, ELAINE DUKE, Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, in her official capacity and others
Kelvin Jones, et al v. Governor of Florida, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-14551
Not Classified By Court: SERVICE and ARTHUR CARL HASPEL
Defendant / Appellant: GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and FLORIDA SECRETARY OF STATE
Plaintiff / Appellee: CURTIS BRYANT, KELVIN LEON JONES, DIANE SHERRILL and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF NEBRASKA, STATE OF UTAH, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
American Society for Testing, et al v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc.
as 17-7035
Amicus Curiae: David Michaels, Bruce R. James, Robert B. Reich and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: National Fire Protection Association, Inc., American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc. and American Society for Testing and Materials
Defendant / Appellant: Public.Resource.Org, Inc.
Oracle America, Inc. v. Google LLC
as 17-1118
Amicus Curiae: STEVE WOZNIAK, AMERICAN PHOTOGRAPHIC ARTISTS, JOSEPH SCOTT MILLER and others
Defendant / Cross Appellant: GOOGLE LLC and GOOGLE INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant: ORACLE AMERICA, INC.
Google Inc. v. Hood We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00981
Plaintiff: Google Inc.
Defendant: Jim Hood, Digital Citizens Alliance, Taylor Hooton Foundation and others
Interested Party: Gina Morris
Amicus Curiae: International AntiCounterfeiting Coalition, Attorney General Jack Conway, Electronic Frontier Foundation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?