Cases 11 - 20 of 48
SHELTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv80735
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JASON R SHELTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander Hamilton v. Ron Davis, et al
as 20-16495
Defendant / Appellee:
R. SHELTON, Lieutenant, RON DAVIS, Warden, J. BERMUDEZ, Sergeant and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEXANDER RASHAD HAMILTON
Damond v. State Of Louisiana et al
as 3:2020cv00437
Defendant:
Will Mitchell, Thomas Eskola, State Of Louisiana and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn Damond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Carter v. Ralph Shelton, et al
as 19-16565
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY CARTER
Defendant:
SAN QUENTIN STATE PRISON
Defendant / Appellee:
FITZSIMMONS, Officer and RALPH R. SHELTON
Hamilton v. Davis et al
as 4:2019cv01223
Plaintiff:
Alexander Rashad Hamilton
Defendant:
Lieutenant R. Shelton, Captain V Larkin, Officer T. Duke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Giles v. Davis et al
as 4:2018cv07466
Defendant:
Cpt. J. Arnold, C.O F. Jaugan, Lt. B. Vanmastrigf and others
Plaintiff:
Ossie Giles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Giles v. Davis et al
as 4:2018cv04724
Defendant:
J. Cartwright, R. Bloomfield, Ron Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Ossie Giles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anculle et al v. United States of America
as 3:2018cv00308
Plaintiff:
Anna M. Kraujalis, Priscilla A. Blackburn, Malibu K. Messer and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Carter v. Shelton et al
as 3:2018cv02035
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Carter
Defendant:
Ralph R. Shelton, Fitsimmons and San Quentin State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-3890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
