Cases 1 - 10 of 77
USA v. Silva-Torres
as 24-50565
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Khelvy R. Silva-Torres
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2083
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
(PC)Barnett v. Hernandez et al
as 1:2023cv01126
Plaintiff:
Troas V. Barnett
Defendant:
H. Hernandez, R. Silva, J. Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SILVA-TORRES v. PISTRO et al
as 5:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
KHELVY R SILVA-TORRES
Defendant:
KEVIN PISTRO, C MCGEE and BRETT FLOYD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Thomas Bastian v. Rondald Evans, et al
as 23-15012
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS O. BASTIAN
Defendant / Appellee:
RONDALD EVANS, Deputy Warden at ADCCR/ Eyman Complex SMU 1, BETTY ULIBERRI-RUIZ, Paralegal at ADCRR/ Eyman Complex SMU 1, R SILVA, COIV/ Disciplinary Hearing Office at ADCRR/ Eyman Complex and others
De La Torre #218066 v. Parcels et al
as 2:2022cv02168
Plaintiff:
Andres De La Torre
Defendant:
A Parcels, Ronald Evans, Betty Uliberri-Ruiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bastian #144716 v. Evans et al
as 2:2022cv01855
Plaintiff:
Thomas O Bastian
Defendant:
Rondald Evans, Betty Uliberri-Ruiz, R Silva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bastian #144716 et al v. Evans et al
as 2:2022cv01699
Plaintiff:
Thomas O Bastian and Andres delaTorre
Defendant:
Ronald Evans, R Silva, A Parcels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2117
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Silva
as 21-50081
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Roberto Silva, also known as "Beto", also known as Jose Silva, also known as Jose R. Silva
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
