Cases 1 - 10 of 296
Hill v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2025cv00567
Plaintiff:
Lekeshia R Hill
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Young v. Vantell et al
as 3:2025cv00143
Plaintiff:
Jason Young
Defendant:
Vance Vantell, Core Civic, f/n/a Cuebas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
(PC) Bonilla v. Hill
as 2:2025cv00062
Defendant:
Brad R. Hill
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clowney v. Greenville County et al
as 6:2024cv07241
Defendant:
Greenville County, Sheriff Hobart Lewis, Joe Kernell and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Vandale Clowney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5949
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
WASHINGTON v. ANDREWS et al
as 3:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
MARLO WASHINGTON
Defendant:
R HILL, C ANDREWS and ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03864
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
(PC) Green v. Hill et al
as 2:2024cv01475
Defendant:
Folsom State Prison and R. Hill
Plaintiff:
Brounche S. Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Green v. Hill et al
as 2:2024at00657
Plaintiff:
Brounche S. Green
Defendant:
R. Hill and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
