Cases 21 - 30 of 64
Acosta v. Gardner
as 3:2018cv00722
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
David Gardner and HO-JO's Mini Mart
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Secretary of Labor v. Dreamlife Community, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00492
Plaintiff:
Secretary of Labor R. Alexander Acosta and Secretary of Labor
Defendant:
Edreisha Humphrey, individual, Dreamlife Community, LLC and Edreisha Humphrey
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv00079
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Department of Labor v. Day-Mont Behavioral Health Care, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00242
Defendant:
Akil Sharif, Individual, Gayle Johnson, Individual, Day-Mont Behavioral Health Care Inc. Employee Benefit Plan and others
Plaintiff:
Secretary of Labor R. Alexander Acosta and Thomas E. Perez Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Acosta v. Los Amigos of Kalamazoo, Inc., et al.
as 1:2018cv00746
Defendant:
Juan Carlos Ortiz, Francisco Hernandez, Rosa Bravo and others
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Ramirez
as 3:2018cv00170
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Gustavo Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Healing Springs Med-Care, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00325
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Healing Springs Med-Care, LLC and Kenneth Uwaezuoke
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. New Image Landscaping, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00429
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
New Image Landscaping, LLC and Jeremy Cizauskas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Sterling Ponds Plaza, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv10888
Petitioner:
R Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Sterling Ponds Plaza, LLC and Kyriakos Vlahadamis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Stass Restaurant, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv10886
Plaintiff:
R Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Stass Restaurant, Inc. and Kyriakos Vlahadamis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
