Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Acosta v. Rahim
as 4:2019mc00011
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Niehal Ray Rahim
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Boe et al
as 0:2019cv00868
Defendant:
Minn-Dak Asphalt, Inc., Kilen Boe, Minn-Dak Asphalt, Inc. Life Insurance Plan and others
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Acosta v. Tokyo Sushi Omaha, LLC et al
as 8:2019cv00064
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Tokyo Sushi Omaha, LLC and Kong Shun ("Randy") Gao
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Express Medical Transportation, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv00064
Plaintiff:
Secretary of Labor R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Kristin Ziade and Express Medical Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Isla Pacifico, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv00016
Defendant:
El Tapatio, LLC, Isla Pacifico, LLC and Jesus Herrera
Plaintiff:
Secretary of Labor R. Alexander Acosta and United States Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Wagbon LLC et al
as 0:2018cv03451
Defendant:
Wagbon LLC and Joseph A. Wagner
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Ramanis, LLC d/b/a La Costa Mexicana et al
as 4:2019cv00044
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Ruben Angel, Eduardo Garcia and Romanis, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
R Alexander Acosta v. China Palace, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv00594
Defendant:
Miao Hui Zhang, Jian Zhang and China Palace, Inc.
Plaintiff:
R Alexander Acosta and R. Alexander Acosta
Acosta v. Buffet House NE, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv03150
Defendant:
Guang Xin Ye, Buffet House NE, Inc. and Celina Wang
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Triple V Concrete Construction, Inc., et al
as 0:2018cv02942
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Jennifer Vanderwerf, Layne Vanderwerf and Triple V Concrete Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
