Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Beall et al v. The City of Morgantown
as 1:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Lieutenant Mitchell Beall, Brandon Bailey, Joseph R. Bragg and others
Counter Defendant:
John Borzik, Lieutenant Charles D. Campbell, Michael Close and others
Defendant:
The City of Morgantown
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Stoops v. Sherman, et al.
as 1:2016cv01026
Plaintiff:
Randy Stoops
Defendant:
Stuart Sherman, E. Williams, A. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRAGG v. OWENS CORNING SALES, LLC
as 1:2014cv01604
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY R BRAGG
Defendant:
OWENS CORNING SALES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Bragg v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2012cv00256
Plaintiff:
Wendy R Bragg
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BRAGG v. A-C PRODUCT LIABIILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv52340
Plaintiff:
BURLEY R. BRAGG
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABIILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Kallas v. Underwood Trucks, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00935
Plaintiff:
Charles F. Kallas
Defendant:
Underwood Trucks, Inc., Underwood Trucks, Inc., Underwood Trucks, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
BRAGG v. A-BEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv73650
Plaintiff:
HOBART R. BRAGG, JR., HOBART R. BRAGG, JR., HOBART R. BRAGG, JR. and others
Defendant:
A-BEX CORPORATION, A-BEX CORPORATION, GAF CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
ASBESTOS CORPORATION, LTD., ATLAS TURNER, INC., LAC D'AMIANTE DU QUEBEC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Bragg v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2007oe40445
Plaintiff:
Miriam R. Bragg
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C. and Ortho McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
