Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Joseph Mays v. Jennifer Saad
as 23-7127
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH RANDOLPH MAYS
Defendant / Appellee:
JENNIFER SAAD, RICHARD HUDGINS, MS. R. THOMPSON and others
Baltas v. Cook
as 22-65
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joe Baltas
Defendant / Appellee:
Rollin Cook, In His Individual and Official Capacities, a Connecticut DOC employee
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, In His Individual and Official Capacities, Allen, In His Individual and Official Capacities, Little, In His Individual and Official Capacities and others
Baltas v. Cook
as 3:2021cv01461
Plaintiff:
Joe Baltas
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Rollin Cook, Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joe Baltas v. Harold Clarke
as 21-6590
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER J. MILGRAM, In His Individual and Official Capacities, SERGEANT LITTLE, In His Individual and Official Capacities, UNIT MANAGER ERIC MILLER, In His Individual and Official Capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOE BALTAS
Mays v. Saad et al
as 3:2020cv00199
Defendant:
Angela Dunbar, Ian Connors, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Randolph Mays
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mays v. Hudgins et al
as 3:2020cv00181
Defendant:
Richard Hudgins, Brent Miller, R. Clem and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Randolph Mays
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chand v. Kiser et al
as 7:2020cv00181
Defendant:
Ms. Murphy, C.O. Sexton, Walter Swiney and others
Plaintiff:
Vinnie Vincent Chand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Platt v. Graham et al
as 1:2019cv01829
Defendant:
James Graham, R. Clem Malot, David Bolton and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Platt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Danny Clem
as 08-5737
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANNY R. CLEM
USA v. Danny Clem
as 08-5738
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANNY R. CLEM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
