Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Prater v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00888
Plaintiff:
Randall T. Prater
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Walter A. McNeil, Harry K. Singletary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tolliver v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00871
Plaintiff:
James L. Tolliver
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Asbelti Llorens Cordero, Mark Inch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCSWAIN v. HAND et al
as 4:2020cv00423
Defendant:
J COKER, V HOUCK, E HAND and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GLENN MCSWAIN, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARCLAY v. HAND et al
as 4:2020cv00142
Defendant:
CENTURION LLC, E HAND, E WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES W BARCLAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OSSIE LUCY BB, JR v. HAND et al
as 4:2019cv00538
Defendant:
MARK INCH, JIMMY CORKIES, E HAND and others
Plaintiff:
OSSIE LUCY BB, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webb v. Landrum et al
as 3:2018cv00361
Plaintiff:
Lazavius Webb
Defendant:
Christopher P. Landrum, Julie Jones, John C. Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv01316
Plaintiff:
Dennis Dean Cooper
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Corizon Inc., Dr. L. Melendez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv00288
Plaintiff:
Dennis Dean Cooper
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Corizon Inc., L. Melendez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MELENDEZ v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2015cv00450
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HOWER MELENDEZ
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORIZON HEALTHCARE PROVIDER, M NICHOLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prater v. Jones et al
as 3:2015cv00810
Plaintiff:
Randall T. Prater
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, J. Shunbert, Stuart K. Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
