Cases 1 - 10 of 109
Da Ron Hooks v. R. Madden et al
as 5:2023cv00290
Petitioner:
Da Ron Hooks
Respondent:
R. Madden and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hooks v. Madden et al
as 3:2023cv00311
Petitioner:
Da Ron Hooks
Respondent:
R. Madden and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Anthony Powell v. R. Madden
as 2:2023cv00555
Petitioner:
Michael Anthony Powell
Respondent:
R. Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hasson Hedgepeth v. R. Madden
as 22-16853
Petitioner / Appellant:
HASSON HEDGEPETH
Respondent / Appellee:
R. MADDEN
Stevie Stevenson v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 22-56027
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVIE J. STEVENSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, PHD: Secretary of CDCR, SCOTT KERNAN, Undersecretary/Secretary of CDCR, SHANNON SWAIN, Acting Superintendent of Education and others
John C. Rodriguez v. R. Madden et al
as 3:2022cv01437
Plaintiff:
John C. Rodriguez
Respondent:
R Madden and Valencia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
John C. Rodriguez v. R. Madden et al
as 2:2022cv05519
Plaintiff:
John C. Rodriguez
Defendant:
R. Madden and Correctional Officer Valencia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevie Stevenson v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 22-55557
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVIE J. STEVENSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, PHD: Secretary of CDCR, SCOTT KERNAN, Undersecretary/Secretary of CDCR, SHANNON SWAIN, Acting Superintendent of Education and others
Gardiser v. Madden
as 3:2022cv00743
Petitioner:
Jason Warren Gardiser
Respondent:
R. Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fernandez v. Duarte et al
as 3:2022cv00446
Plaintiff:
Frank J. Fernandez
Defendant:
Duarte, -, R. Madden, J. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
